Site icon Pashto News and Current Affairs Channel | Khyber News

IHC Suspends CII Opinion on Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza

The IHC Suspends CII Opinion on Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza after a legal challenge has shaken the foundations of the Council of Islamic Ideology’s authority. The Islamabad High Court (IHC), led by Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, has temporarily halted the CII’s advisory ruling on the controversial religious scholar while crucial questions remain unanswered.

Key Developments: IHC Blocks CII Ruling

Constitutional Challenge: Who Can Approach the CII?

Justice Kayani raised a serious constitutional issue: under Pakistan’s law, only the president, a governor, or Parliament can formally seek the Council of Islamic Ideology’s opinion — not private individuals or institutions. Pakistan Today+2Suno News+2
The court asked whether a private entity should even be allowed to petition the CII, highlighting concerns about precedent and institutional overreach. Pakistan Today

Mirza’s Role Strengthened in Court

In a significant move, the IHC allowed Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza himself to become a party to the case. Pakistan Today+1
Advocate Tahir Ayubi argued that Mirza should be heard directly because the Council’s opinion has potentially irreversible reputational and legal consequences. UrduPoint
The judge agreed, granting Mirza formal standing in the petition filed by Dr. Aslam Khaki. The News International+1

Legal and Investigative Pressure on CII

Earlier, the IHC issued notices to various bodies — the CII, the FIA, and the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) — demanding answers about how the Council classified Mirza as “blasphemous.” Daily Pakistan
The judge questioned how this referral to the CII happened, especially since the law restricts such referrals to only certain high-level authorities. Times of Karachi+1

Background: Who Is Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza?

Why This Case Matters

  1. Constitutional precedent: The court’s questioning of the CII’s jurisdiction could reshape how and when the Council may issue opinions in the future.

  2. Blasphemy law debate: This case amplifies ongoing public discussion around blasphemy laws, free speech, and due process in Pakistan.

  3. Religious authority challenged: If the IHC ultimately rules that the CII overstepped, it may curb similar rulings against other public figures.

What’s Next

Exit mobile version